The Majoritarian.Let the people decide.

You trust elected officials and voters over judges on the questions that divide the country. Courts should step in only when a law plainly breaks the Constitution, and otherwise leave the arguing to democracy.

Where you stand. On all five axes.

Reading the Constitution

Balanced

States and the nation

Balanced

The presidency

Balanced

Liberty and order

Balanced

The courts

Strongly judicial restraint
Original meaningLiving documentNational governmentStatesThe MadisonianThe Originalist SentinelThe Federalist StewardThe Constitutional LibertarianThe Civil Liberties ChampionThe Living ConstitutionalistThe National BuilderThe Strong but Fair ExecutiveThe Guardian of OrderThe Pragmatic Centrist
The Majoritarian (filled) among the other 10. Hover a dot for its name.

The Majoritarian

“Ballots, not briefs.”

  • The courtsStrongly judicial restraint
  • Liberty and orderBalanced
  • The presidencyBalanced

constilumen.com/play/compass

Your profile card. What you’d share.

Take the compass and your own card shows your scores on every axis. Copy the link to your result and anyone who opens it sees the same picture.

Where you’re strong

  • Keeps hard choices with the people accountable for them
  • Humble about what judges can know

Where you’re tested

  • Majorities have overridden minorities before
  • Deference can mean rights go unenforced

Your docket. How you’d likely rule.

Six hypothetical cases, decided from where The Majoritarian stands on each one’s axis. Hypothetical on purpose: no real judge’s record is implied.

DocketThe Majoritarian
  1. No. 01State v. Federal MandateA governor refuses to carry out a new federal program inside the state.States and the nationWeighs the facts; could go either way.
  2. No. 02In re AirstrikesThe President orders sustained airstrikes abroad without asking Congress.The presidencyWeighs the facts; could go either way.
  3. No. 03City v. Rally OrganizersA city bans a peaceful rally whose message most residents find hateful.Liberty and orderWeighs the facts; could go either way.
  4. No. 04Challengers v. Popular StatuteA law passed by a wide margin is challenged as unconstitutional.The courtsDefers to the legislature unless the violation is plain.
  5. No. 05Petitioner v. Unnamed RightA court is asked to recognize a right the text never names.Reading the ConstitutionWeighs the facts; could go either way.
  6. No. 06People v. Roadside SearchPolice search a car without a warrant and find evidence of a crime.Liberty and orderWeighs the facts; could go either way.
A Stacklumen Product