The Majoritarian.Let the people decide.
You trust elected officials and voters over judges on the questions that divide the country. Courts should step in only when a law plainly breaks the Constitution, and otherwise leave the arguing to democracy.
Where you stand. On all five axes.
The Majoritarian
“Ballots, not briefs.”
- The courtsStrongly judicial restraint
- Liberty and orderBalanced
- The presidencyBalanced
constilumen.com/play/compass
Your profile card. What you’d share.
Take the compass and your own card shows your scores on every axis. Copy the link to your result and anyone who opens it sees the same picture.
Where you’re strong
- Keeps hard choices with the people accountable for them
- Humble about what judges can know
Where you’re tested
- Majorities have overridden minorities before
- Deference can mean rights go unenforced
Your docket. How you’d likely rule.
Six hypothetical cases, decided from where The Majoritarian stands on each one’s axis. Hypothetical on purpose: no real judge’s record is implied.
- No. 01State v. Federal MandateA governor refuses to carry out a new federal program inside the state.States and the nationWeighs the facts; could go either way.
- No. 02In re AirstrikesThe President orders sustained airstrikes abroad without asking Congress.The presidencyWeighs the facts; could go either way.
- No. 03City v. Rally OrganizersA city bans a peaceful rally whose message most residents find hateful.Liberty and orderWeighs the facts; could go either way.
- No. 04Challengers v. Popular StatuteA law passed by a wide margin is challenged as unconstitutional.The courtsDefers to the legislature unless the violation is plain.
- No. 05Petitioner v. Unnamed RightA court is asked to recognize a right the text never names.Reading the ConstitutionWeighs the facts; could go either way.
- No. 06People v. Roadside SearchPolice search a car without a warrant and find evidence of a crime.Liberty and orderWeighs the facts; could go either way.
The clauses you lean on. In the document itself.
Cases that test you. From the record.
The landmark cases that turned on your two strongest axes: the courts and liberty and order.
- Marbury v. Madison5 U.S. 137 (1803) · 4–0 · The courtsCan the Supreme Court refuse to apply an act of Congress that conflicts with the Constitution?
- Cooper v. Aaron358 U.S. 1 (1958) · 9–0 · The courtsCould Arkansas officials delay desegregation in Little Rock by opposing Brown?
- Loper Bright Enterprises v. Raimondo603 U.S. 369 (2024) · 6–2 · The courtsMust courts defer to an agency’s reasonable reading of an ambiguous statute?
- Korematsu v. United States323 U.S. 214 (1944) · 6–3 · Liberty and orderWas the wartime exclusion of people of Japanese ancestry from the West Coast constitutional?
- Brandenburg v. Ohio395 U.S. 444 (1969) · 8–0 · Liberty and orderCould Ohio convict a Ku Klux Klan leader for advocating violence at a rally?
- Katz v. United States389 U.S. 347 (1967) · 7–1 · Liberty and orderWas recording a call from a public phone booth without a warrant a search?
Your rival: The Civil Liberties Champion
Rights are most tested when they are least popular.
Read their sideFurther reading. Official and nonpartisan.
The Bill of Rights
The first ten amendments, as ratified in 1791.
National Archives
Register to vote
Registration deadlines and how to register in every state and territory.
U.S. government
Constitution Annotated
The official, clause-by-clause analysis of how the Constitution has been interpreted.
Library of Congress
The Interactive Constitution
Each clause explained by scholars from different perspectives.
National Constitution Center
All civic resources, including how to register to vote and find your election office.