The Constitutional Libertarian.The Bill of Rights is a list of things government may not do.
You read the Constitution as a limit on government at every level. You want courts to enforce those limits firmly, against states and Washington alike, and you are wary of power concentrated anywhere.
Where you stand. On all five axes.
The Constitutional Libertarian
“Liberty first, and courts to guard it.”
- Liberty and orderStrongly individual liberty
- The presidencyLeans checked executive
- States and the nationLeans states
constilumen.com/play/compass
Your profile card. What you’d share.
Take the compass and your own card shows your scores on every axis. Copy the link to your result and anyone who opens it sees the same picture.
Where you’re strong
- Defends unpopular speakers, gun owners and defendants alike
- Skeptical of every branch, not just the other side’s
Where you’re tested
- Strong judicial enforcement sits awkwardly with restraint
- Little room for collective action in a crisis
Your docket. How you’d likely rule.
Six hypothetical cases, decided from where The Constitutional Libertarian stands on each one’s axis. Hypothetical on purpose: no real judge’s record is implied.
- No. 01State v. Federal MandateA governor refuses to carry out a new federal program inside the state.States and the nationSides with the state: Washington cannot commandeer it.
- No. 02In re AirstrikesThe President orders sustained airstrikes abroad without asking Congress.The presidencyRequires a vote of Congress.
- No. 03City v. Rally OrganizersA city bans a peaceful rally whose message most residents find hateful.Liberty and orderStrikes the ban: the rally goes ahead.
- No. 04Challengers v. Popular StatuteA law passed by a wide margin is challenged as unconstitutional.The courtsEnforces the Constitution and strikes the law.
- No. 05Petitioner v. Unnamed RightA court is asked to recognize a right the text never names.Reading the ConstitutionDeclines: it is not in the text or the nation’s tradition.
- No. 06People v. Roadside SearchPolice search a car without a warrant and find evidence of a crime.Liberty and orderExcludes the evidence: get a warrant.
Cases that test you. From the record.
The landmark cases that turned on your two strongest axes: liberty and order and the presidency.
- Korematsu v. United States323 U.S. 214 (1944) · 6–3 · Liberty and orderWas the wartime exclusion of people of Japanese ancestry from the West Coast constitutional?
- Brandenburg v. Ohio395 U.S. 444 (1969) · 8–0 · Liberty and orderCould Ohio convict a Ku Klux Klan leader for advocating violence at a rally?
- Katz v. United States389 U.S. 347 (1967) · 7–1 · Liberty and orderWas recording a call from a public phone booth without a warrant a search?
- Youngstown Sheet & Tube Co. v. Sawyer343 U.S. 579 (1952) · 6–3 · The presidencyCould President Truman seize the nation’s steel mills during the Korean War without authority from Congress?
- United States v. Nixon418 U.S. 683 (1974) · 8–0 · The presidencyCould President Nixon withhold White House tapes subpoenaed for a criminal trial?
- Trump v. United States603 U.S. 593 (2024) · 6–3 · The presidencyIs a former President immune from criminal prosecution for official acts?
Your rival: The Guardian of Order
To insure domestic Tranquility.
Read their sideFurther reading. Official and nonpartisan.
The Bill of Rights
The first ten amendments, as ratified in 1791.
National Archives
Register to vote
Registration deadlines and how to register in every state and territory.
U.S. government
Constitution Annotated
The official, clause-by-clause analysis of how the Constitution has been interpreted.
Library of Congress
The Interactive Constitution
Each clause explained by scholars from different perspectives.
National Constitution Center
All civic resources, including how to register to vote and find your election office.