The Madisonian.Ambition must be made to counteract ambition.

You read the Constitution first as a machine for dividing power. No branch should be able to act alone on the things that matter most, and the presidency in particular should answer to Congress and the courts.

Where you stand. On all five axes.

Reading the Constitution

Balanced

States and the nation

Balanced

The presidency

Strongly checked executive

Liberty and order

Leans individual liberty

The courts

Balanced
Original meaningLiving documentNational governmentStatesThe Originalist SentinelThe Federalist StewardThe Constitutional LibertarianThe Civil Liberties ChampionThe Living ConstitutionalistThe National BuilderThe Strong but Fair ExecutiveThe Guardian of OrderThe MajoritarianThe Pragmatic Centrist
The Madisonian (filled) among the other 10. Hover a dot for its name.

The Madisonian

“Power checks power, or nothing does.”

  • The presidencyStrongly checked executive
  • Liberty and orderLeans individual liberty
  • Reading the ConstitutionBalanced

constilumen.com/play/compass

Your profile card. What you’d share.

Take the compass and your own card shows your scores on every axis. Copy the link to your result and anyone who opens it sees the same picture.

Where you’re strong

  • Consistent across parties: the limits apply whoever holds office
  • Takes Congress’s war and spending powers seriously

Where you’re tested

  • Can leave the government slow in a real emergency
  • Gridlock is a feature to you and a failure to others

Your docket. How you’d likely rule.

Six hypothetical cases, decided from where The Madisonian stands on each one’s axis. Hypothetical on purpose: no real judge’s record is implied.

DocketThe Madisonian
  1. No. 01State v. Federal MandateA governor refuses to carry out a new federal program inside the state.States and the nationWeighs the facts; could go either way.
  2. No. 02In re AirstrikesThe President orders sustained airstrikes abroad without asking Congress.The presidencyRequires a vote of Congress.
  3. No. 03City v. Rally OrganizersA city bans a peaceful rally whose message most residents find hateful.Liberty and orderStrikes the ban: the rally goes ahead.
  4. No. 04Challengers v. Popular StatuteA law passed by a wide margin is challenged as unconstitutional.The courtsWeighs the facts; could go either way.
  5. No. 05Petitioner v. Unnamed RightA court is asked to recognize a right the text never names.Reading the ConstitutionWeighs the facts; could go either way.
  6. No. 06People v. Roadside SearchPolice search a car without a warrant and find evidence of a crime.Liberty and orderExcludes the evidence: get a warrant.
A Stacklumen Product