The Madisonian.Ambition must be made to counteract ambition.
You read the Constitution first as a machine for dividing power. No branch should be able to act alone on the things that matter most, and the presidency in particular should answer to Congress and the courts.
Where you stand. On all five axes.
The Madisonian
“Power checks power, or nothing does.”
- The presidencyStrongly checked executive
- Liberty and orderLeans individual liberty
- Reading the ConstitutionBalanced
constilumen.com/play/compass
Your profile card. What you’d share.
Take the compass and your own card shows your scores on every axis. Copy the link to your result and anyone who opens it sees the same picture.
Where you’re strong
- Consistent across parties: the limits apply whoever holds office
- Takes Congress’s war and spending powers seriously
Where you’re tested
- Can leave the government slow in a real emergency
- Gridlock is a feature to you and a failure to others
Your docket. How you’d likely rule.
Six hypothetical cases, decided from where The Madisonian stands on each one’s axis. Hypothetical on purpose: no real judge’s record is implied.
- No. 01State v. Federal MandateA governor refuses to carry out a new federal program inside the state.States and the nationWeighs the facts; could go either way.
- No. 02In re AirstrikesThe President orders sustained airstrikes abroad without asking Congress.The presidencyRequires a vote of Congress.
- No. 03City v. Rally OrganizersA city bans a peaceful rally whose message most residents find hateful.Liberty and orderStrikes the ban: the rally goes ahead.
- No. 04Challengers v. Popular StatuteA law passed by a wide margin is challenged as unconstitutional.The courtsWeighs the facts; could go either way.
- No. 05Petitioner v. Unnamed RightA court is asked to recognize a right the text never names.Reading the ConstitutionWeighs the facts; could go either way.
- No. 06People v. Roadside SearchPolice search a car without a warrant and find evidence of a crime.Liberty and orderExcludes the evidence: get a warrant.
Cases that test you. From the record.
The landmark cases that turned on your two strongest axes: the presidency and liberty and order.
- Youngstown Sheet & Tube Co. v. Sawyer343 U.S. 579 (1952) · 6–3 · The presidencyCould President Truman seize the nation’s steel mills during the Korean War without authority from Congress?
- United States v. Nixon418 U.S. 683 (1974) · 8–0 · The presidencyCould President Nixon withhold White House tapes subpoenaed for a criminal trial?
- Trump v. United States603 U.S. 593 (2024) · 6–3 · The presidencyIs a former President immune from criminal prosecution for official acts?
- Korematsu v. United States323 U.S. 214 (1944) · 6–3 · Liberty and orderWas the wartime exclusion of people of Japanese ancestry from the West Coast constitutional?
- Brandenburg v. Ohio395 U.S. 444 (1969) · 8–0 · Liberty and orderCould Ohio convict a Ku Klux Klan leader for advocating violence at a rally?
- Katz v. United States389 U.S. 347 (1967) · 7–1 · Liberty and orderWas recording a call from a public phone booth without a warrant a search?
Your rival: The Strong but Fair Executive
Energy in the executive, under the law.
Read their sideFurther reading. Official and nonpartisan.
The Bill of Rights
The first ten amendments, as ratified in 1791.
National Archives
Register to vote
Registration deadlines and how to register in every state and territory.
U.S. government
Constitution Annotated
The official, clause-by-clause analysis of how the Constitution has been interpreted.
Library of Congress
The Interactive Constitution
Each clause explained by scholars from different perspectives.
National Constitution Center
All civic resources, including how to register to vote and find your election office.