The Living Constitutionalist.A charter meant to endure for ages to come.
You see the Constitution as a framework of principles whose application grows with the country. Courts should read its broad guarantees in light of what we now understand, and the nation should be able to act on national problems.
Where you stand. On all five axes.
The Living Constitutionalist
“The principles hold; their reach grows.”
- Reading the ConstitutionStrongly living document
- The courtsLeans judicial engagement
- States and the nationLeans national government
constilumen.com/play/compass
Your profile card. What you’d share.
Take the compass and your own card shows your scores on every axis. Copy the link to your result and anyone who opens it sees the same picture.
Where you’re strong
- Lets old guarantees meet new facts, from wiretaps to the internet
- Sees the document’s broad language as deliberate
Where you’re tested
- Who decides what the principles now require?
- Readings can shift with whoever holds the Court
Your docket. How you’d likely rule.
Six hypothetical cases, decided from where The Living Constitutionalist stands on each one’s axis. Hypothetical on purpose: no real judge’s record is implied.
- No. 01State v. Federal MandateA governor refuses to carry out a new federal program inside the state.States and the nationSides with the nation: federal law is supreme.
- No. 02In re AirstrikesThe President orders sustained airstrikes abroad without asking Congress.The presidencyWeighs the facts; could go either way.
- No. 03City v. Rally OrganizersA city bans a peaceful rally whose message most residents find hateful.Liberty and orderStrikes the ban: the rally goes ahead.
- No. 04Challengers v. Popular StatuteA law passed by a wide margin is challenged as unconstitutional.The courtsEnforces the Constitution and strikes the law.
- No. 05Petitioner v. Unnamed RightA court is asked to recognize a right the text never names.Reading the ConstitutionRecognizes it from the document’s principles.
- No. 06People v. Roadside SearchPolice search a car without a warrant and find evidence of a crime.Liberty and orderExcludes the evidence: get a warrant.
Cases that test you. From the record.
The landmark cases that turned on your two strongest axes: reading the constitution and the courts.
- Griswold v. Connecticut381 U.S. 479 (1965) · 7–2 · Reading the ConstitutionCould a state ban married couples from using contraceptives?
- District of Columbia v. Heller554 U.S. 570 (2008) · 5–4 · Reading the ConstitutionDoes the Second Amendment protect an individual right to keep a handgun at home?
- Dobbs v. Jackson Women’s Health Organization597 U.S. 215 (2022) · 6–3 · Reading the ConstitutionDoes the Constitution confer a right to abortion?
- Marbury v. Madison5 U.S. 137 (1803) · 4–0 · The courtsCan the Supreme Court refuse to apply an act of Congress that conflicts with the Constitution?
- Cooper v. Aaron358 U.S. 1 (1958) · 9–0 · The courtsCould Arkansas officials delay desegregation in Little Rock by opposing Brown?
- Loper Bright Enterprises v. Raimondo603 U.S. 369 (2024) · 6–2 · The courtsMust courts defer to an agency’s reasonable reading of an ambiguous statute?
Your rival: The Originalist Sentinel
The words meant something, and they still do.
Read their sideFurther reading. Official and nonpartisan.
The Bill of Rights
The first ten amendments, as ratified in 1791.
National Archives
Register to vote
Registration deadlines and how to register in every state and territory.
U.S. government
Constitution Annotated
The official, clause-by-clause analysis of how the Constitution has been interpreted.
Library of Congress
The Interactive Constitution
Each clause explained by scholars from different perspectives.
National Constitution Center
All civic resources, including how to register to vote and find your election office.