The Federalist Steward.Fifty laboratories, not one blueprint.

You see the states as the Constitution’s first line of self-government. Most decisions belong close to the people they affect, and Washington should act only where the document clearly gives it the power.

Where you stand. On all five axes.

Reading the Constitution

Leans original meaning

States and the nation

Strongly states

The presidency

Balanced

Liberty and order

Balanced

The courts

Leans judicial restraint
Original meaningLiving documentNational governmentStatesThe MadisonianThe Originalist SentinelThe Constitutional LibertarianThe Civil Liberties ChampionThe Living ConstitutionalistThe National BuilderThe Strong but Fair ExecutiveThe Guardian of OrderThe MajoritarianThe Pragmatic Centrist
The Federalist Steward (filled) among the other 10. Hover a dot for its name.

The Federalist Steward

“Closer to home is closer to the people.”

  • States and the nationStrongly states
  • Reading the ConstitutionLeans original meaning
  • The courtsLeans judicial restraint

constilumen.com/play/compass

Your profile card. What you’d share.

Take the compass and your own card shows your scores on every axis. Copy the link to your result and anyone who opens it sees the same picture.

Where you’re strong

  • Lets communities differ instead of fighting over one national rule
  • Keeps federal power within its listed bounds

Where you’re tested

  • States have also been the ones denying rights
  • National problems can outrun state lines

Your docket. How you’d likely rule.

Six hypothetical cases, decided from where The Federalist Steward stands on each one’s axis. Hypothetical on purpose: no real judge’s record is implied.

DocketThe Federalist Steward
  1. No. 01State v. Federal MandateA governor refuses to carry out a new federal program inside the state.States and the nationSides with the state: Washington cannot commandeer it.
  2. No. 02In re AirstrikesThe President orders sustained airstrikes abroad without asking Congress.The presidencyWeighs the facts; could go either way.
  3. No. 03City v. Rally OrganizersA city bans a peaceful rally whose message most residents find hateful.Liberty and orderWeighs the facts; could go either way.
  4. No. 04Challengers v. Popular StatuteA law passed by a wide margin is challenged as unconstitutional.The courtsDefers to the legislature unless the violation is plain.
  5. No. 05Petitioner v. Unnamed RightA court is asked to recognize a right the text never names.Reading the ConstitutionDeclines: it is not in the text or the nation’s tradition.
  6. No. 06People v. Roadside SearchPolice search a car without a warrant and find evidence of a crime.Liberty and orderWeighs the facts; could go either way.
A Stacklumen Product