The Federalist Steward.Fifty laboratories, not one blueprint.
You see the states as the Constitution’s first line of self-government. Most decisions belong close to the people they affect, and Washington should act only where the document clearly gives it the power.
Where you stand. On all five axes.
The Federalist Steward
“Closer to home is closer to the people.”
- States and the nationStrongly states
- Reading the ConstitutionLeans original meaning
- The courtsLeans judicial restraint
constilumen.com/play/compass
Your profile card. What you’d share.
Take the compass and your own card shows your scores on every axis. Copy the link to your result and anyone who opens it sees the same picture.
Where you’re strong
- Lets communities differ instead of fighting over one national rule
- Keeps federal power within its listed bounds
Where you’re tested
- States have also been the ones denying rights
- National problems can outrun state lines
Your docket. How you’d likely rule.
Six hypothetical cases, decided from where The Federalist Steward stands on each one’s axis. Hypothetical on purpose: no real judge’s record is implied.
- No. 01State v. Federal MandateA governor refuses to carry out a new federal program inside the state.States and the nationSides with the state: Washington cannot commandeer it.
- No. 02In re AirstrikesThe President orders sustained airstrikes abroad without asking Congress.The presidencyWeighs the facts; could go either way.
- No. 03City v. Rally OrganizersA city bans a peaceful rally whose message most residents find hateful.Liberty and orderWeighs the facts; could go either way.
- No. 04Challengers v. Popular StatuteA law passed by a wide margin is challenged as unconstitutional.The courtsDefers to the legislature unless the violation is plain.
- No. 05Petitioner v. Unnamed RightA court is asked to recognize a right the text never names.Reading the ConstitutionDeclines: it is not in the text or the nation’s tradition.
- No. 06People v. Roadside SearchPolice search a car without a warrant and find evidence of a crime.Liberty and orderWeighs the facts; could go either way.
Cases that test you. From the record.
The landmark cases that turned on your two strongest axes: states and the nation and reading the constitution.
- McCulloch v. Maryland17 U.S. 316 (1819) · 7–0 · States and the nationCould Congress charter a national bank, and could a state tax it?
- Wickard v. Filburn317 U.S. 111 (1942) · 9–0 · States and the nationCould Congress limit wheat a farmer grew for use on his own farm?
- United States v. Lopez514 U.S. 549 (1995) · 5–4 · States and the nationCould Congress ban guns near schools under its commerce power?
- Griswold v. Connecticut381 U.S. 479 (1965) · 7–2 · Reading the ConstitutionCould a state ban married couples from using contraceptives?
- District of Columbia v. Heller554 U.S. 570 (2008) · 5–4 · Reading the ConstitutionDoes the Second Amendment protect an individual right to keep a handgun at home?
- Dobbs v. Jackson Women’s Health Organization597 U.S. 215 (2022) · 6–3 · Reading the ConstitutionDoes the Constitution confer a right to abortion?
Your rival: The National Builder
One nation, able to act as one.
Read their sideFurther reading. Official and nonpartisan.
The Bill of Rights
The first ten amendments, as ratified in 1791.
National Archives
Register to vote
Registration deadlines and how to register in every state and territory.
U.S. government
Constitution Annotated
The official, clause-by-clause analysis of how the Constitution has been interpreted.
Library of Congress
The Interactive Constitution
Each clause explained by scholars from different perspectives.
National Constitution Center
All civic resources, including how to register to vote and find your election office.